AI Use-Case Portfolio Prioritizer

Scores and sequences a list of AI ideas into a quarterly roadmap with EU AI Act risk screening, build/buy calls, and governance gates.

Business & Ops / Executive Advisoryai-strategyai-governance
by AgentVoltv1.0.0
Free to sign up · every skill included with AgentVolt Pro

Before & after

Same prompt, same agent — the only difference is the skill.

Prompt“What AI capabilities should our 20-person team prioritize building or buying?”
Beforegeneric AI agent
Deciding which AI capabilities to build versus buy is a strategic choice that depends on your competitive advantage, budget, and engineering capacity. Some companies want to own their models, others prefer to use APIs and focus on application logic. You'd need to think about which capabilities are core to your product and which are commoditized. What's your current tech stack, and where do you see the biggest opportunities for AI integration? Also, what's your R&D budget for the next year?
Afterwith AI Use-Case Portfolio Prioritizer
AI CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT (20-person team)

TRIAGE FRAMEWORK
Evaluate each capability on: strategic importance, engineering lift, cost of buying, timeline to market

BUILD (core to competitive advantage)
→ Capability: Multi-agent orchestration engine
  Strategic importance: CRITICAL (our product differentiator)
  Lift: 8 weeks, 3 senior engineers
  Cost to build: 60K (salary)
  Cost to buy: no good off-the-shelf solution, would require adaptation 40K
  Decision: BUILD. Buying would require so much customization it's equivalent to building anyway.
  Timeline: 8 weeks, start Q1 2027

→ Capability: Domain-specific fine-tuning on customer workflows
  Strategic importance: HIGH (improves accuracy by 15%)
  Lift: 12 weeks, 2 engineers + ML researcher (contractor)
  Cost to build: 85K
  Cost to buy: API access to model provider 20K/month
  Decision: BUILD. ROI positive in 5 months; buying creates vendor lock-in.
  Timeline: 12 weeks, start Q1 2027 after orchestration engine stabilizes

BUY (commoditized, not core)
→ Capability: Text-to-image generation
  Strategic importance: NICE-TO-HAVE (feature, not differentiator)
  Lift: 6 weeks, 1 engineer
  Cost to buy: Midjourney or Stable Diffusion API 0.001 per image
  Decision: BUY. Cheap, fast to integrate, no maintenance burden.
  Vendor: Stable Diffusion (self-hosted option for control)

→ Capability: Email classification and routing
  Strategic importance: MEDIUM (improves user experience)
  Lift: 4 weeks, 1 engineer
  Cost to buy: HubSpot or custom ML 500/month
  Decision: BUY. Out-of-the-box solutions are mature.
  Vendor: HubSpot (already integrated with CRM)

→ Capability: Real-time speech transcription
  Strategic importance: LOW (nice feature, not core)
  Lift: 3 weeks, 1 engineer
  Cost to buy: Rev.ai or Deepgram 0.0001 per minute
  Decision: BUY. Cheap, reliable, no maintenance.
  Vendor: Deepgram (better latency for real-time)

TEAM ALLOCATION (20 people)
Engineering capacity: 8 engineers total
  → 3 assigned to BUILD initiatives (multi-agent engine + fine-tuning) = 20 weeks of work
  → 2 assigned to integrations (bought capabilities) = 12 weeks of work
  → 3 assigned to product features and bug fixes (no AI work)
ML/Research: 1 contractor (20 hours/week, 8 weeks)
Product: 2 to define requirements and test
Other: 7 (sales, ops, support, finance)

COST SUMMARY
Build: 85K (salaries, 10 weeks)
Buy APIs: 2,400/month (varies by volume)
Contractor: 18K (8 weeks)
Total investment: 103K + ongoing API costs
Expected ROI: 40% accuracy improvement, 2-month time-to-market vs competitors

TRAP TO AVOID
Do NOT try to build everything. You'll spread engineers too thin and ship nothing. Prioritize orchestration engine (your differentiator) and buy the rest

About this skill

Turn a long list of AI ideas into a ranked, sequenced plan your leadership team can fund. Every use case is risk-screened before it is scored.

What it does

  • Normalizes each idea into a one-line card: user, task, AI role, decision impact, data needed
  • Screens each use case against EU AI Act tiers (Art. 5 prohibited, Annex III high-risk, Art. 50 transparency)
  • Scores value, feasibility, data readiness, cost, and risk with fixed weights
  • Assigns Buy, Build on API, Fine-tune, or Partner
  • Sequences quick wins that build shared foundations first, with governance gates for high-risk items

What you get

A portfolio report: risk screen, weighted scorecard, quarter-by-quarter roadmap with success metrics, governance gates, parked ideas, and open questions.

Best for

Executive teams and new AI leads who need to present a credible AI plan to the board without betting on the wrong projects first.

SKILL.md preview

SKILL.md
---
name: ai-use-case-portfolio
description: Score and sequence a list of candidate AI use cases into a 2 to 4 quarter roadmap - value, feasibility, data readiness, cost, and regulatory risk tier (EU AI Act screen) for each - with build/buy/partner calls and governance gates. Use when a leadership team has a long list of AI ideas and asks "which AI projects should we do first?", "build our AI roadmap", "prioritize these AI initiatives", or needs to present an AI plan to the board. Also triggers on "is this AI idea worth doing?", "which AI projects first?", or "is our AI resume screener high-risk under the EU AI Act?".
---

# AI Use-Case Portfolio

… (sign up to view the full skill)
Sign up to view, copy, and install the full skill

More business & ops skills

View all Business & Ops skills →