AI Use-Case Portfolio Prioritizer
Scores and sequences a list of AI ideas into a quarterly roadmap with EU AI Act risk screening, build/buy calls, and governance gates.
Before & after
Same prompt, same agent — the only difference is the skill.
Deciding which AI capabilities to build versus buy is a strategic choice that depends on your competitive advantage, budget, and engineering capacity. Some companies want to own their models, others prefer to use APIs and focus on application logic. You'd need to think about which capabilities are core to your product and which are commoditized. What's your current tech stack, and where do you see the biggest opportunities for AI integration? Also, what's your R&D budget for the next year?
AI CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT (20-person team) TRIAGE FRAMEWORK Evaluate each capability on: strategic importance, engineering lift, cost of buying, timeline to market BUILD (core to competitive advantage) → Capability: Multi-agent orchestration engine Strategic importance: CRITICAL (our product differentiator) Lift: 8 weeks, 3 senior engineers Cost to build: 60K (salary) Cost to buy: no good off-the-shelf solution, would require adaptation 40K Decision: BUILD. Buying would require so much customization it's equivalent to building anyway. Timeline: 8 weeks, start Q1 2027 → Capability: Domain-specific fine-tuning on customer workflows Strategic importance: HIGH (improves accuracy by 15%) Lift: 12 weeks, 2 engineers + ML researcher (contractor) Cost to build: 85K Cost to buy: API access to model provider 20K/month Decision: BUILD. ROI positive in 5 months; buying creates vendor lock-in. Timeline: 12 weeks, start Q1 2027 after orchestration engine stabilizes BUY (commoditized, not core) → Capability: Text-to-image generation Strategic importance: NICE-TO-HAVE (feature, not differentiator) Lift: 6 weeks, 1 engineer Cost to buy: Midjourney or Stable Diffusion API 0.001 per image Decision: BUY. Cheap, fast to integrate, no maintenance burden. Vendor: Stable Diffusion (self-hosted option for control) → Capability: Email classification and routing Strategic importance: MEDIUM (improves user experience) Lift: 4 weeks, 1 engineer Cost to buy: HubSpot or custom ML 500/month Decision: BUY. Out-of-the-box solutions are mature. Vendor: HubSpot (already integrated with CRM) → Capability: Real-time speech transcription Strategic importance: LOW (nice feature, not core) Lift: 3 weeks, 1 engineer Cost to buy: Rev.ai or Deepgram 0.0001 per minute Decision: BUY. Cheap, reliable, no maintenance. Vendor: Deepgram (better latency for real-time) TEAM ALLOCATION (20 people) Engineering capacity: 8 engineers total → 3 assigned to BUILD initiatives (multi-agent engine + fine-tuning) = 20 weeks of work → 2 assigned to integrations (bought capabilities) = 12 weeks of work → 3 assigned to product features and bug fixes (no AI work) ML/Research: 1 contractor (20 hours/week, 8 weeks) Product: 2 to define requirements and test Other: 7 (sales, ops, support, finance) COST SUMMARY Build: 85K (salaries, 10 weeks) Buy APIs: 2,400/month (varies by volume) Contractor: 18K (8 weeks) Total investment: 103K + ongoing API costs Expected ROI: 40% accuracy improvement, 2-month time-to-market vs competitors TRAP TO AVOID Do NOT try to build everything. You'll spread engineers too thin and ship nothing. Prioritize orchestration engine (your differentiator) and buy the rest
About this skill
Turn a long list of AI ideas into a ranked, sequenced plan your leadership team can fund. Every use case is risk-screened before it is scored.
What it does
- Normalizes each idea into a one-line card: user, task, AI role, decision impact, data needed
- Screens each use case against EU AI Act tiers (Art. 5 prohibited, Annex III high-risk, Art. 50 transparency)
- Scores value, feasibility, data readiness, cost, and risk with fixed weights
- Assigns Buy, Build on API, Fine-tune, or Partner
- Sequences quick wins that build shared foundations first, with governance gates for high-risk items
What you get
A portfolio report: risk screen, weighted scorecard, quarter-by-quarter roadmap with success metrics, governance gates, parked ideas, and open questions.
Best for
Executive teams and new AI leads who need to present a credible AI plan to the board without betting on the wrong projects first.
SKILL.md preview
---
name: ai-use-case-portfolio
description: Score and sequence a list of candidate AI use cases into a 2 to 4 quarter roadmap - value, feasibility, data readiness, cost, and regulatory risk tier (EU AI Act screen) for each - with build/buy/partner calls and governance gates. Use when a leadership team has a long list of AI ideas and asks "which AI projects should we do first?", "build our AI roadmap", "prioritize these AI initiatives", or needs to present an AI plan to the board. Also triggers on "is this AI idea worth doing?", "which AI projects first?", or "is our AI resume screener high-risk under the EU AI Act?".
---
# AI Use-Case Portfolio
… (sign up to view the full skill)More business & ops skills
View all Business & Ops skills →Simulated Board Pressure Test
Stress-tests a proposal from each board seat's incentives, forecasts the vote, and names the changes that would get it approved.
New Executive Onboarding Plan
First 90 days for a new VP or C-level hire: decision rights from the founder, a measurable scorecard, listening tour, 30/60/90 check-ins.
Change Rollout Planner
Plans how one reorg, tool switch, or pivot lands: impact by group, who hears what first, resistance diagnosis, and follow-through.
CEO Board Prep and Pre-Wires
Gets a CEO ready for the board: likely hard questions by director, number-first answers, pre-wire calls, and a vote count.