Competitive Teardown
Analyzes competitor products and companies by synthesizing data from pricing pages, app store reviews, job postings, SEO signals, and social media into structured competitive intelligence.
Before & after
Same prompt, same agent — the only difference is the skill.
Competitive analysis involves gathering information from a bunch of different sources—their websites, app store reviews, job postings, social media, that kind of thing. You'd want to compare features, pricing, positioning, and customer feedback. Creating a battle card means summarizing the key differences so your sales team knows how to position against each competitor. It takes time to collect all this data though. Do you want a simple feature comparison or something more detailed with SWOT analysis and positioning strategy?
COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE REPORT COMPETITOR 1: CloudAgent Pro Market position: Early-stage, well-funded (Series B, 45M raised) Pricing: 299/month base, 2K/month for enterprise Customer tier: Mid-market tech companies, 100-500 employees Feature score (vs us): 7.2/10 → Strengths: better mobile app, more pre-built integrations → Weaknesses: slower task execution, limited customization Customer satisfaction (G2 reviews): 4.1/5 (n=120 reviews), churn complaints about pricing Go-to-market: Direct sales, expensive paid acquisition (CAC ~3K) COMPETITOR 2: BuildAI Market position: Competitor and partner (strategic integrations) Pricing: 499/month, no enterprise option listed Customer tier: Enterprise only (self-selected) Feature score (vs us): 8.7/10 → Strengths: superior customization, dedicated support → Weaknesses: slower onboarding, steeper learning curve Customer satisfaction (G2 reviews): 4.6/5 (n=85 reviews), strong technical support praise Go-to-market: Strategic partnerships, high contract values (500K+ average) COMPETITOR 3: SimpleAgents Market position: Competitor (same ICP) Pricing: 99/month, highly self-serve Customer tier: Startups, freelancers, SMBs Feature score (vs us): 5.1/10 → Strengths: cheap, simple UX, fast to deploy → Weaknesses: limited scale, reliability issues (frequent errors) Customer satisfaction (G2 reviews): 3.8/5 (n=45 reviews), complaints about support responsiveness Go-to-market: SEO, content marketing, bottom-up product adoption POSITIONING MAP X-axis: Price (99 → 500) Y-axis: Enterprise-readiness (startup-friendly → enterprise-grade) We position: middle-right (premium but not locked to enterprise only) CloudAgent Pro: middle-left (accessible, less rigorous) BuildAI: top-right (most expensive, most robust) SimpleAgents: bottom-left (cheap, unstable) SALES BATTLE CARDS IF PROSPECT ASKS ABOUT CLOUDAGENT PRO: "They're less expensive upfront, but their mobile app and integrations hide a 40% slower execution time. Our customers run 3x more tasks per day because we don't have that bottleneck." IF PROSPECT ASKS ABOUT BUILDAI: "BuildAI is enterprise-focused and expensive. We offer 80% of their features at 40% of the cost. Good fit if you need white-glove support, but most teams don't need that level of hand-holding after onboarding." IF PROSPECT ASKS ABOUT SIMPLEAGENTS: "SimpleAgents is cheap but unreliable. You'll spend more time firefighting failed tasks than saving money. We've had customers switch from SimpleAgents and reduce their error rate from 8% to under 0.5%." OUR ADVANTAGE SUMMARY → Best price-to-feature ratio → Faster execution than CloudAgent Pro → Better value than BuildAI (80% features, 40% cost) → More reliable than SimpleAgents (99.5% uptime vs 94%)
About this skill
name: competitive-teardown description: Use when Analyzes competitor products and companies by synthesizing data from pricing pages, app store reviews, job postings, SEO signals, and social media into structured competitive intelligence.
Competitive Teardown
Analyzes competitor products and companies by synthesizing data from pricing pages, app store reviews, job postings, SEO signals, and social media into structured competitive intelligence. Produces feature comparison matrices scored across 12 dimensions, SWOT analyses, positioning maps, UX audits, pricing model breakdowns, action item roadmaps, and stakeholder presentation templates. Use when conducting competitor analysis, comparing products against competitors, researching the competitive landscape, building battle cards for sales, preparing for a product strategy or roadmap session, responding to a competitor's new feature or pricing change, or performing a quarterly competitive review.
What you get
- Public GitHub repo (alirezarezvani/claude-skills)
- the competitive-teardown skill folder with SKILL.md. Part of a 337-skill / 30-agent / 70-command install.
Customize your output
- Fork the repo and adapt the skill's instructions and references to your workflow.
Example output
Activates automatically when your request matches Competitive Teardown; chains with the other skills, agents, and commands in the collection.
Best for
Creators, builders, and teams using Claude Code.
SKILL.md preview
---
name: competitive-teardown
description: Use when conducting competitor analysis or building a full competitive intelligence package from public signals like pricing, reviews, job postings, and SEO.
version: 1.0.0
category: Business & Ops / Product
author: AgentVolt
license: proprietary
tags:
- business-ops
- product
---
# Competitive Teardown
Synthesizes public signals — pricing, reviews, job postings, SEO, social — into structured competitive intelligence: comparison matrices, SWOT, positioning maps, and action roadmaps.
## When to use
… (sign up to view the full skill)More business & ops skills
View all Business & Ops skills →Product Manager Toolkit
Comprehensive toolkit for product managers including RICE prioritization, customer interview analysis, PRD templates, discovery frameworks, and go-to-market strategies.
Product Skills
Coordinates a set of product-management sub-skills — prioritization, discovery, UX research, competitive teardown, analytics, roadmapping.
Experiment Designer
Use when planning product experiments, writing testable hypotheses, estimating sample size, prioritizing tests, or interpreting A/B outcomes with practical statistical rigor.
UX Researcher & Designer
UX research and design toolkit for Senior UX Designer/Researcher including data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis.