Commercial Skills
Routes commercial-motion requests to the right specialist workflow and returns one consolidated digest instead of a scattered answer.
Before & after
Same prompt, same agent — the only difference is the skill.
Discount decisions are tricky. You need to think about your margins, whether the customer is strategic, and what your alternatives are. A 20 percent discount is significant, so you'd want to make sure it makes sense for the business. You might want to look at what similar deals have done. It could be worth it if it's a big opportunity or strategically important, but that depends on your situation.
DISCOUNT DECISION SCORECARD - Enterprise Prospect Analysis DEAL SUMMARY: → Prospect: Fortune 500 financial services company → Annual contract value (ACV): $400,000 (list price) → Proposed discount: 20 percent → $320,000 ACV → Revenue impact: -$80,000/year (first 3 years: -$240,000) QUANTITATIVE SCORING: Factor 1: GROSS MARGIN IMPACT (target: preserve >75% margin) → COGS per customer: $12,000/year (product + support) → List price margin: 93% ($388k profit on $400k ACV) → Discounted margin: 92.5% ($308k profit on $320k ACV) → Verdict: PASS (margin degrades 0.5%, still healthy) Factor 2: CUSTOMER QUALITY (LTV score) → Probability of renewal: 95% (enterprise customers renew) → Expansion potential: Moderate (single division, cross-sell +$50k/year) → Net LTV (3-year): $924,000 at 75% discount (vs $1,200,000 at list) → LTV/CAC ratio: 9.2x (still excellent; industry 3:1 minimum) → Verdict: PASS (strong LTV justifies investment) Factor 3: COMPETITIVE PRESSURE (alternatives available?) → Incumbent solution: Manual spreadsheets (low switching cost to us) → Competing vendors: 2 (Vendor A $350k, Vendor B $330k at discount) → Our positioning: Feature parity + 15% faster implementation → Discount necessity: MODERATE (not a price war, but competitive) → Verdict: CONDITIONAL (discount is negotiating tactic, not requirement) Factor 4: PIPELINE IMPACT (precedent risk) → Current pipeline: 8 similar-size prospects (potential $2.4M revenue) → Discount precedent: If 50% of pipeline demands 20%, revenue loss = $240,000/year → Market positioning: Discounting erodes premium positioning → Sales team pressure: Likely increase discount requests → Verdict: RISK (sets unwanted precedent) QUALITATIVE FACTORS: Strategic value: → Brand halo: Fortune 500 customer adds credibility (+) → Reference ability: Likely willing to be reference (+) → Future expansion: Division can expand to 3 business units (++) → Geographic anchor: Entry into Northeast region (+) → Verdict: MODERATE-HIGH strategic value Timing pressure: → Fiscal year deadline: Prospect must close by 2024-12-31 (9 weeks) → Budget constraint: $320k fits their approved capex (-) → Competitive urgency: Vendor B pushing for decision this month (+) → Verdict: TIME-SENSITIVE (pressure on both sides) RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT 15% DISCOUNT (COUNTER-OFFER) Rationale: → Gross margin remains 92.7% (acceptable) → LTV/CAC ratio: 10.2x (still tier-1) → Avoids 20% precedent while closing deal → Justifies to sales team: market rate between list ($400k) and competitor ($330k) → Strategic brand value + expansion potential outweighs revenue loss Negotiation playbook: → Position: "We can do $340k (15% off); standard for quarter-over-quarter enterprise commitments." → Condition: Require 2-year contract minimum (vs 1-year standard) → Sweetener: Add 90-day extended implementation support (cost: $8k, perceived value: $40k) → Result: Prospect gets $8k value-add without further price reduction Next steps: → Send counter-offer by end of week → Escalate to VP Sales if prospect pushes back below $340k → Prepare walk-away threshold: Not below $330k (margins erode too much)
About this skill
name: commercial-skills description: Use when Use when reviewing, approving, or designing commercial motion — pricing models, deal review, discount approval, partnership economics, channel mix, commercial policy, RFP/RFI response, bookings for...
Commercial Skills
Use when reviewing, approving, or designing commercial motion — pricing models, deal review, discount approval, partnership economics, channel mix, commercial policy, RFP/RFI response, bookings forecast. Triggers on "review this deal", "should we discount", "pricing model", "partner economics", "RFP response", "bookings forecast", "channel mix". Forks context to route to one of seven Commercial sub-skills (pricing-strategist, deal-desk, partnerships-architect, channel-economics, commercial-policy, rfp-responder, commercial-forecaster) and returns a digest. Distinct from business-growth (sales execution) and c-level-advisor/cro-advisor (strategic CRO judgment).
What you get
- Public GitHub repo (alirezarezvani/claude-skills)
- the commercial-skills skill folder with SKILL.md. Part of a 337-skill / 30-agent / 70-command install.
Customize your output
- Fork the repo and adapt the skill's instructions and references to your workflow.
Example output
Activates automatically when your request matches Commercial Skills; chains with the other skills, agents, and commands in the collection.
Best for
Creators, builders, and teams using Claude Code.
SKILL.md preview
---
name: commercial-skills
description: Use this skill when reviewing, approving, or designing commercial motion such as pricing models, deal review, discount approval, partnership economics, channel mix, commercial policy, RFP response, and bookings forecasting.
version: 1.0.0
category: Sales / Sales and Commercial
author: AgentVolt
license: proprietary
tags:
- sales
- sales-and-commercial
---
# Commercial Skills
Routes commercial-motion requests to the right specialist workflow and returns one consolidated digest instead of a scattered answer.
## When to use
… (sign up to view the full skill)More sales skills
View all Sales skills →Partnerships Architect
Classifies a prospective partnership by tier, designs the joint GTM commitment that tier implies.
Pricing Strategist
Guides pricing-model design and packaging decisions: selecting a pricing model, running Van Westendorp analysis on willingness-to-pay data.
Rfp Responder
Parses buyer-dictated requirements out of an RFP and builds a Shipley-method proof-point matrix so every requirement gets a verifiable answer instead of generic proposal.
Channel Economics
Use when reviewing or rebalancing direct vs.