ISO 42001 Gap Assessment
Assess your AI management system against ISO/IEC 42001 clauses 4-10 and Annex A, draft the SoA, and plan certification.
Before & after
Same prompt, same agent — the only difference is the skill.
ISO 42001 is an important framework for AI governance. Meeting its requirements involves documentation, risk assessment, and governance structures. The specifics depend on your organization's size and what AI systems you're using. I can definitely help you think through compliance steps, but ISO 42001 is fairly detailed and you'd probably want to involve legal or compliance expertise alongside technical implementation. Common areas include risk management, transparency, bias mitigation, and documentation. Without understanding your specific AI usage and org structure, I can only offer general guidance. Do you have a specific area of compliance you're most concerned about, or are you starting from scratch?
ISO 42001 COMPLIANCE ROADMAP: AI Governance framework STANDARARD: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (AI management systems) CURRENT STATE: No formal governance structure TARGET COMPLETION: 120 days PILLAR 1: AI GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE (Days 1-30) → Appoint AI governance lead (assign owner) → Document AI use cases in your org (inventory sheet: 8 uses identified) → Risk classification per use case (high/medium/low) → Compliance accountability matrix PILLAR 2: RISK MANAGEMENT & BIAS MITIGATION (Days 31-60) → Conduct AI impact assessments (template provided for 8 use cases) → Data quality audits (training data provenance, bias checks) → Model monitoring plan (drift detection, performance tracking) → Testing regime (adversarial tests, edge case coverage) PILLAR 3: DOCUMENTATION & TRANSPARENCY (Days 61-90) → AI model cards (what each model does, limitations, datasets) → Decision audit trails (why model was chosen, which version deployed) → User-facing transparency (disclosures where AI involved) → Change log (versioning, retraining events) PILLAR 4: HUMAN OVERSIGHT & CONTROLS (Days 91-120) → Escalation procedures (when model fails, who decides) → Human review checkpoints (for high-risk decisions) → Team training (governance responsibilities) → Board reporting template (quarterly update format) KEY DOCUMENTS TO CREATE: 1. AI governance policy (1-2 pages, high-level) 2. Risk register (spreadsheet of all 8 use cases + scores) 3. Model cards (one per deployed model) 4. Audit trail template (for decision logging) COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST: 23 items total □ Governance structure assigned (ownership clear) □ Risk register complete (all models risk-scored) □ Bias testing documented (test results in audit trail) □ Board notified (governance in minutes) ESTIMATED RESOURCE NEED: 80 hours (1 lead + tech team support) NOTE: This is guidance based on ISO 42001 requirements, not legal advice. Consult compliance counsel for final sign-off.
About this skill
Find out how far you are from an ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certification audit, clause by clause and control by control. Then get a roadmap sequenced the way auditors assess.
What it does
- Assesses clauses 4-10 (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement) against your evidence
- Drafts a Statement of Applicability covering Annex A groups A.2-A.10 with justifications for applicability and exclusions
- Prioritizes certification blockers such as scope, AI policy, risk and impact assessment, internal audit, and management review
- Reuses your existing ISO 27001 or ISO 9001 processes instead of building parallel ones
What you get
A gap assessment with a readiness summary, clause findings, the draft SoA, the documented information you must maintain, and a phased roadmap through Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits.
Best for
AI product companies, GRC teams, and consultants preparing for ISO 42001 certification or customer AI-governance due diligence.
SKILL.md preview
---
name: iso-42001-gap-assessment
description: Run a gap assessment against ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (AI management system) covering clauses 4-10 and the Annex A controls, then produce a Statement of Applicability draft, a list of required documented information, and a prioritized roadmap to certification readiness. Use when the user asks about ISO 42001, an AIMS, AI governance certification, "what do we need for 42001", a Statement of Applicability for AI, or wants to know how far they are from a certification audit, including casual asks like "do we need 42001", "is our AI policy enough for 42001", or "what does A.6 actually want from us".
---
# ISO 42001 Gap Assessment
… (sign up to view the full skill)More business & ops skills
View all Business & Ops skills →General Counsel Plan Review
A General Counsel issue-spot of one plan: IP, worker classification, securities, privacy, export, ads, and when you need a lawyer.
Services Proposal, SOW and Contract Drafter
Draft proposals, SOWs, freelance agreements, MSAs, and NDAs with acceptance, change orders, payment, and IP terms. Counsel-review flagged.
Compliance Control Mapper
Maps one control set to SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 and EU AI Act with owners, evidence tracking, and gaps ranked by audit risk.
General Counsel Advisor
On-call startup General Counsel: founder IP, equity, contractors, SAFEs and term sheets, privacy, demand letters, and when to call a lawyer.