Design Critique with Prioritized Fix List

Critiques a UI, landing page, or layout against its goal and returns ranked fixes with exact sizes, spacing, and contrast ratios.

Designdesign-critiqueui-review
by AgentVoltv1.0.0
Free to sign up · every skill included with AgentVolt Pro

Before & after

Same prompt, same agent — the only difference is the skill.

Prompt“Review this UI mockup and give actionable feedback.”
Beforegeneric AI agent
I'd be happy to review your UI mockup and give you feedback. To make my review most helpful, I should probably see the mockup first and understand what you're trying to accomplish with it. It would also be useful to know who the users are and what problems you're solving for them. Once I see the design, I can comment on things like visual hierarchy, usability, consistency with best practices, and whether the layout makes sense. I can also point out any potential issues with contrast, readability, or touch targets if it's a mobile design. Share the mockup and let me know if there are specific areas you want me to focus on, and I'll give you detailed feedback.
Afterwith Design Critique with Prioritized Fix List
DESIGN FEEDBACK REPORT: DASHBOARD MOCKUP

OVERALL ASSESSMENT
Strengths: Clean grid layout, good color contrast, clear information hierarchy
Weaknesses: Dense sidebar, call-to-action not prominent, mobile responsiveness unclear

CRITICAL FEEDBACK (Fix before launch)
1. PRIMARY CTA PLACEMENT
   Issue: Export Report button bottom-right, hard to find
   Fix: Move to top-right OR floating action button (FAB)
   Priority: HIGH (primary user action)

2. FORM INPUT STYLING
   Issue: Input labels gray (67% contrast on white); fails WCAG AA
   Fix: Darken labels to #333333 (90% contrast) OR use bold weight
   Priority: HIGH (accessibility)

3. MOBILE VIEWPORT (320px)
   Issue: Sidebar fixed width (280px) = only 40px content area
   Fix: Collapse sidebar on mobile (hamburger toggle)
   Priority: HIGH (usability)

SECONDARY FEEDBACK (Nice to have)
4. ICON CLARITY
   Suggestion: Settings icon too small (16px -> 20px minimum)
   Rationale: Touch target should be 44px minimum (iOS HIG)

5. TABLE SORT INDICATOR
   Suggestion: Add arrow icon (^ v) to active column header
   Rationale: Telegraphs sortability, improves discoverability

6. ERROR STATE VISUAL
   Suggestion: Input error -> red left border (not just red text)
   Rationale: Users with color blindness rely on shape/position

DESIGN CONSISTENCY
• Typography: Body text 14px (good); ensure heading hierarchy (18, 20, 24pt)
• Spacing: 16px grid observed; apply consistently (aligned)
• Colors: Primary blue #0071E3, secondary gray #6B7280 (sufficient contrast)

ACTION PLAN
Priority 1 (Fix this week): Accessibility issues + mobile collapse
Priority 2 (Next iteration): Icon sizing, sort indicators, error states
Delivery: Updated mockup in Figma + component specs ready for dev

About this skill

Your design "feels off" and you can't say why, or the feedback you get is a mix of taste opinions that are all treated as equally important. This skill critiques a design the way a senior designer does in a review. It names what the screen is for, checks where the eye lands first, and returns a short ranked list of fixes with real values you can apply right away.

What it does

  • Names the screen's job and its main action first, then ties every finding to that job instead of to personal taste
  • Runs a first-glance hierarchy read ("the eye goes here, then here") and compares it to the order you intended
  • Computes WCAG contrast ratios from your hex codes and estimates them from screenshots, labeled as estimates, including text placed over photos
  • Checks spacing, alignment, type size, line length, and tap target size against concrete limits, not "looks cramped"
  • Tests the design with real content and states: long names, empty lists, errors, focus, and translated text
  • Compares two design directions on the same criteria, picks a winner, and says what to borrow from the other one

What you get

A one-line verdict, then fixes grouped as Blocker, Should fix, and Polish. Each fix says where the problem is, why it hurts the goal, and the exact change to make, such as a size, a spacing value, an overlay opacity, or a replacement hex color.

Best for

Founders, marketers, and developers shipping landing pages or app screens without a design lead, and designers who want a structured second review before handoff or launch.

SKILL.md preview

SKILL.md
---
name: design-critique-fix-list
description: Critiques a UI screen, landing page, layout, or graphic against its actual job, then returns a prioritized fix list (Blocker / Should fix / Polish) with concrete values - sizes, spacing, contrast ratios computed from hex codes, overlay opacities, and placement changes. Use when the user says "what's wrong with this design", "critique my landing page", "why does this layout feel off", "which of these two directions is better", "review my Figma before handoff", "my CTA isn't getting clicks and I think it's the design", "is this accessible", or "give me feedback on this mockup".
---

# Design Critique with Prioritized Fix List

… (sign up to view the full skill)
Sign up to view, copy, and install the full skill

More design skills

View all Design skills →