GStack
Gary Tan's (YC CEO) full Claude Code workflow as a skill — CEO, engineering, design, QA, security, release, and docs review all in one.
Before & after
Same prompt, same agent — the only difference is the skill.
Sure, I can review it. What's the feature about, and what are you most concerned about? Is this a customer-facing change or internal? I'd look for logical correctness, error handling, and whether it fits your architecture. Do you want me to check the design too, or just code? Are there any security considerations? QA testing coverage? Let me know the specifics and I can give you a thorough review before you ship.
GSTACK MULTI-LAYER REVIEW: FEATURE READY FOR SHIP
CEO LAYER → SCOPE & IMPACT
Feature scope → Matches sprint goal (✓)
Stakeholder alignment → Confirmed with marketing, support (✓)
Metrics → Tracked in analytics (✓)
Risk level → Low, feature flag in place (✓)
Ship go-no-go → GO, proceed to next layer
ENGINEERING LAYER → CODE QUALITY & PERF
Issues found → 2 blocking, 3 nice-to-have
BLOCKING:
1. Missing null check on user.preferences (line 47) → Crash risk
2. Database query N+1 pattern → 3x slower on 1k users
NICE-TO-HAVE:
3. Error message vague ("Failed") → Unclear to users
4. No deprecation warning on old endpoint
5. Type inference could be more specific
Performance → Worse than target by 12% on cold start
Code review → BLOCKED until null check + query optimization fixed
DESIGN LAYER → UX & ACCESSIBILITY
Issues found → 1 blocking, 2 minor
BLOCKING:
1. Button contrast ratio 3.2:1 → WCAG AA requires 4.5:1
MINOR:
2. Mobile layout test → Works, but margin feels tight on 320px
3. Hover state missing on disabled button (desktop)
Design sign-off → BLOCKED until contrast ratio fixed
QA LAYER → TEST COVERAGE
Unit tests → 82% coverage (target 80%, good)
Integration tests → Edge cases missing:
• Concurrent user updates → Race condition possible
• Empty state rendering → Not tested
Functional test → Happy path works, 3 error paths untested
Suggested → Add 2 more tests before merge (30 min effort)
SECURITY LAYER
Input validation → Sufficient (rate limit + sanitize)
Auth check → Correct (user_id derived from session)
Data exposure → None (scoped query by user_id)
Risk → LOW
SHIP DECISION: BLOCKED
Required fixes → Null check (5 min), DB query (15 min), contrast ratio (5 min)
Estimated wait → 1 hour
Re-review → Post-fix, quick approval expected
Alternative → Disable feature in dark mode, ship with flag OFF (not recommended)About this skill
name: gstack description: Use when Gary Tan's (YC CEO) full Claude Code workflow as a skill — CEO, engineering, design, QA, security, release, and docs review all in one.
GStack
Created by Gary Tan, CEO of Y Combinator, GStack packages his complete startup development methodology into a single skill. It covers CEO review, engineering review, design review, QA, security, release management, and documentation. Instead of letting Claude randomly build and pray, GStack enforces a proper startup workflow: think, plan, build, review, test, ship, reflect.
What you get
- Full startup workflow coverage, multi-role review process (CEO, engineering, design, QA, security), disciplined think-plan-build-ship methodology.
Customize your output
- Enable or disable specific review roles depending on project stage and team size. Skip CEO layer for pure technical builds.
Example output
GStack review: CEO layer flagged scope creep on feature X, engineering caught missing error handling, QA found 2 untested edge cases. Ship blocked until resolved.
Best for
Startup founders, indie hackers, vibe coders who want judgment and discipline built into their Claude workflow beyond just writing code.
SKILL.md preview
---
name: gstack
description: Use this skill when a startup's development process needs a single enforced workflow spanning engineering, design, QA, security, release, and documentation review instead of an ad hoc build cycle.
version: 1.0.0
category: Development / Startup Workflow
author: AgentVolt
license: proprietary
tags:
- development
- startup-workflow
- standard
---
# GStack
Packages a complete startup development methodology into one enforced pipeline: think, plan, build, review, test, ship, reflect.
## When to use
… (sign up to view the full skill)